Collaborative Benchmarking

Collaborative Benchmarking is a participatory activity designed to compare a current process or practice with external references (best practices, industry standards, or processes from other areas). Participants work in teams to identify areas for improvement, adapting external learnings to their own context.


Preparation

  1. Define the purpose
    • Establish the objective of the activity: Improve a specific process? Introduce innovation? Increase efficiency?
  2. Select external references
    • Identify processes, standards, or practices from other areas, companies, teams, or industries that are relevant to the topic.
    • Example: If evaluating a customer service process, include references from companies known for excellence in that area.
  3. Prepare materials
    • Documents or examples of selected processes for comparison.
    • Visual analysis tools such as matrices or diagrams.
    • Whiteboards, sticky notes, or digital tools to record findings.
  4. Organize the space
    • For in-person sessions, set up stations with information on external processes.
    • For virtual sessions, create folders or collaborative boards with accessible data for participants.

Step-by-step instructions

  1. Introduction to the purpose
    • Explain that the goal is to analyze processes by comparing them with best practices or external references to identify applicable improvements.
  2. Presentation of the processes to evaluate
    • Briefly describe the internal process to be improved.
    • Provide relevant information about the selected external references.
  3. Division into teams
    • Divide participants into small teams, assigning each a specific area of the process to analyze.
  4. Comparative analysis
    • Each team evaluates their assigned area in comparison with external references, considering:
      • Strengths: What are we doing well in comparison?
      • Differences: What do external references do better?
      • Opportunities: What could we adopt or adapt?
    • Use tools such as comparison matrices, flow diagrams, or process maps.
  5. Synthesis and improvement proposals
    • Each team presents their findings and improvement proposals to the whole group.
    • Facilitate a discussion to prioritize the most relevant and feasible actions.
  6. Implementation planning
    • Define the necessary steps to apply the identified improvements, assigning responsibilities and estimated timelines.
  7. Closure and reflection
    • Summarize the main lessons learned and the expected impact of the improvements.
    • Thank participants for their collaboration.
Recommendations
  • Select relevant references: Ensure that external practices are applicable to the evaluated process.
  • Encourage creativity: Motivate teams to adapt, not just copy, external ideas.
  • Document the process: Record comparisons and proposals for implementation and follow-up.
  • Prioritize actions: Focus improvements on those with the greatest impact and feasibility.
Materials
  • Documents or information on best practices or external standards.
  • Matrices or tools to record comparisons (digital or physical).
  • Whiteboards, sticky notes, or collaborative boards to record findings and proposals.
Online platforms
Purpose
The purpose of Collaborative Benchmarking is to identify and adopt effective practices from other contexts, adapting them to one's own process to improve efficiency, quality, or innovation.
Type of activity
Participatory Action ResearchParticipatory EvaluationParticipatory InteractionParticipatory Planning
Level of participation
Collaboration, Empowerment, Collaborative assessment, Knowledge generation
Target audience
Educators, Facilitators, Students, Community leaders, NGOs and social collectives, Business teams, Government, Creative designers, Researchers
Fields of application
Education and training, Community development, Organizational and business management, Urban and rural planning, Health and social well-being, Art, culture, and creativity, Sustainability and environment, Public policies and governance, Innovation and design, Research and evaluation, Conflict resolution, Technology and digital environments, Citizen and social participation
Estimated duration
60 to 120 minutes, depending on the depth of analysis and the number of processes to evaluate.
Ideal number of participants
6 to 20 participants, divided into small teams to facilitate comparative analysis.
Topics related to this activity
Analysis ToolCollaborative AnalysisCollaborative InnovationCollaborative ReflectionContinuous ImprovementData CollectionGroup AnalysisKey DataMonitoring ToolParticipatory AnalysisParticipatory InnovationProcess OptimizationStrategic Planning
Other activities that might interest you
Share this activity